The issue, though, is that there seem to be a really limited number of people for whom this appeals (and even fewer if you take away the convention).
Where can the "hobbyists and scientists who wish to share knowledge and promote the conservation and keeping of cichlids" be found... if they're not in clubs like the CCA or MAS? I honestly don't know.
I think there is a core group of people for whom the ACA is a "club" in the traditional sense. And people outside of that core group aren't likely to feel included in the "club"... with a corresponding lack of compelling reasons to remain a member.
Matt
My renewal is due in August every year and I just renewed again. I get the Full membership as I like the printed BB.
I think it's important to keep in mind that the ACA is an association of hobbyists and scientists who wish to share knowledge and promote the conservation and keeping of cichlids. It is not a "club" like CCA or my own club MAS.
Most of the reasons that I have seen posted here were because members did not get the "club" experience that they thought they would get from joining the ACA.
There is nothing wrong with that. But it doesn't mean it is the fault of the ACA.
If your goal is to learn more about cichlids and cichlid conservation then I would highly encourage you to join the ACA. If your goal is to just keep and breed fish, and hang out with other cichlid hobbyists then a local club is what is best for you. Of course you could always do both!
Andy
Proud Member of the American Cichlid Association