danger_chicken
Swim Fishy Swim!
I appreciate you sharing your experience, that always gives me insight to things I may not have thought of - good or bad.Not really danger. If the teeth/strainer in an overflow gets clogged the water can always spill over the top of the overflow and into the drain preventing the tank from overflowing. That is why the tops of overflow boxes are below the lip of the frame. There is no backup mechanism in a siphon. Also keep in mind that should for some strange reason, an overflow become completely clogged only the few gallons of water in the sump of the filter is going to overflow the tank. But since the intake strainers of a canister are most likely located near the bottom of the aquarium the result is that one tank will overflow and the other tank will drain itself down until the siphon sucks air. Consequently draining one tank and greatly increasing the volume of water spilled onto the floor.
Trust me. Filter design is part of what I do for a living. I know what I am talking about. But if you still don't believe me go ahead and try it. After all it's not my floor you will be soaking.
Andy
For the sake of friendly debate, what I'm getting out of your posts isn't that it wont work, just that there is risk of flooding. Assuming the flow can be tuned for this to work the next issue is potential flooding. One possiblity is dasiy-chaining the tanks together. I don't like the idea from a purely fitration point (intake in one tank, return in another); but as overflow prevention this could be more stable than a w/d in regards to flooding - if the flow through is sized correctly.
A large part of what I do for a living is identifying problems and then solutions for those problems. Since I haven't tested any of this its all speculation, but like I said I'm the adventurous type and this is Prince's project not mine . However, if it were mine I'd would test and develop it on a small scale and then go for it! :jumpy: