IS there an advantage to spending the extra money on the emperor?
In my opinion no. My entire fishroom runs on Marineland and has for many, many years. I finally managed to wear out the very first one I ever bought (circa 1994 just two years ago). I have been such a fan of their filters that several people have asked if I get free stuff from them (I do not).
So as an avowed Marineland fan, believe me when I tell you that I do not care for the new Emperor 400s what-so-ever.
On returning to the States at the end of last year I ran out and bought three as I had wanted to try them ever since they hit the market.
They are very complex in their flow design and this leads to constant clogging and flow rate issues. They are the only filters in my fishroom that I regularly have to break completely down for routine maintenance. On average I would say I break them down every two weeks.
Because of the clogging issues they never maintain their "rated" 400 gph flow rate. I would be suprised if any of mine are moving 200 gph. I am also running several 350s and it is very clear that they are moving a lot more water than the higher gph rated 400s.
The positives: A better biowheel with more folds, they hold a lot of water (over a gallon) which slightly increases the tank's actual volume, they hold more media volume than a 350, and they are quieter than a 350.
Negatives: Very complex design that leads to clogging, require frequent breaking down for maintenance, and do not maintain their rated flow rate.
Lastly, the intake tube is square, which makes attaching a sponge prefilter impossible. I normally use them on all my filters.
-Shane