AquaStudent
CCA Members
I've been debating this question with myself for quite some time.
As fishkeepers what is our job and how are we supposed to do it? When I joined the hobby a couple years ago I immediately jumped into planted tank. Quickly, I learned about lighting and nutrient requirements for different plants (the hard way at times). Then the situation became more complicated with information about c02 and other ferts.
Eventually I got the hang of this aquatic gardening and have a fairly successful planted nano tank.
One thing I have noticed is the flora part of the community flourishes c02 injection (even a simple DIY system). In most cases this is completely unnatural yet it works well.
My biggest question is:
Is it our job to try and replicate the natural environment these creatures are from (at least health/condition wise) or should it be our initiative to stretch the system beyond what nature provides?
This is an interesting question to me because fish have adjusted to parameters in nature and are well-suited for their niche in the ecosystem. By keeping them in glass boxes we are changing the game. How much though?
It's strange to think that we should try and provide the best possible environment but in doing so we aren't necessarily replicating nature.
I don't think there's anything wrong with a supernatural setup (adding ferts/c02) as long as it's done safely. We are making a system that we think is better than what they have adapted to in nature.
Then again, our goal may not necessarily be to create the best system for the inhabitants but to create something that is ascetically pleasing to us (while still being well suited to the inhabitants).
As fishkeepers what is our job and how are we supposed to do it? When I joined the hobby a couple years ago I immediately jumped into planted tank. Quickly, I learned about lighting and nutrient requirements for different plants (the hard way at times). Then the situation became more complicated with information about c02 and other ferts.
Eventually I got the hang of this aquatic gardening and have a fairly successful planted nano tank.
One thing I have noticed is the flora part of the community flourishes c02 injection (even a simple DIY system). In most cases this is completely unnatural yet it works well.
My biggest question is:
Is it our job to try and replicate the natural environment these creatures are from (at least health/condition wise) or should it be our initiative to stretch the system beyond what nature provides?
This is an interesting question to me because fish have adjusted to parameters in nature and are well-suited for their niche in the ecosystem. By keeping them in glass boxes we are changing the game. How much though?
It's strange to think that we should try and provide the best possible environment but in doing so we aren't necessarily replicating nature.
I don't think there's anything wrong with a supernatural setup (adding ferts/c02) as long as it's done safely. We are making a system that we think is better than what they have adapted to in nature.
Then again, our goal may not necessarily be to create the best system for the inhabitants but to create something that is ascetically pleasing to us (while still being well suited to the inhabitants).